linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Introduce freeze_super and thaw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:47:19 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
Cc:	Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chris.mason@...cle.com, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce freeze_super and thaw_super for the fsfreeze
 ioctl

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:18:03PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> [snip the horror]
> 
> 	a) traversing superblock list without any locking whatsoever
> 	b) accessing superblock fields <....>
> 	c) <.........................> without making sure that it's not
> going to disappear
> 	d) calling freeze_bdev() without any warranties that its argument
> is not going to be freed under you
> 	e) layering violations all over the place
> etc.

BTW, superblock can be kept alive by an opened file.  umount -l, for example,
will give that.  So it can get freed whenever the last reference to struct
file can go away (AF_UNIX garbage collection, etc.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/