lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:17:15 -0400 From: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com> To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chris.mason@...cle.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, hch@....de Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce freeze_super and thaw_super for the fsfreeze ioctl On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:25:39AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > A cc would have been nice :) > > Thankfully the subject caught my eye. > Well it's not really tux-on-ice's fault, freeze wouldn't work _at all_ via the ioctl or any other method, we just happened to notice it was broken because people using tux-on-ice were getting corrupt filesystems after suspend :). Btw, it may be good to have freezer_sync set to 1 by default, otherwise if an fs doesnt support freezing it will likely end up corrupted too. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists