linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: Add APERF/MPERF support for AMD processors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:55:19 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	davej@...hat.com, linux@...inikbrodowski.net, mingo@...e.hu,
	hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: Add APERF/MPERF support for AMD processors

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:43:04 BST, Thomas Renninger said:

> > +	if (c->cpuid_level >= 6) {

> and remove this (arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c):
>         if (c->cpuid_level > 6) {

So is > or >= the correct comparator here?


Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped