linux-kernel - Re: execve() returns ENOENT when ld-linux.so isn't found

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:56:30 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
To:	Luca Barbieri <luca.barbieri@...il.com>
Cc:	Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: execve() returns ENOENT when ld-linux.so isn't found

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 14:00, Luca Barbieri <luca.barbieri@...il.com> wrote:
> None of these perfectly fit, but EINVAL seems the closest.

No.  ENOENT is the right value.

Once again, read my first message.  The shell cannot just report the
error anyway since there can be many different reasons for the
problem.  If the dynamic linker is missing it has to be discovered and
then reported.  In that message the correct error code is ENOENT.

Don't try to change things which are as good as any other solution.
The error message alone is in no case sufficient.  Fix your shells.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/