linux-kernel - Re: Can not boot with CONFIG_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:18:08 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Can not boot with CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y on i686

On 03/26/2010 05:45 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:10:43AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 03/24/2010 02:04 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 09:06:00PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> On 03/23/2010 04:35 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:26:06AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>>>> After update to 2.6.34-rc1, I was experimented by strange oopses during
>>>>>>> boot, what looked like memory corruption. Bisection shows that first bad
>>>>>>> commit is 59be5a8e8ce765cf739ec7f07176219972de7481 ("x86: Make 32bit
>>>>>>> support NO_BOOTMEM"). When I disable CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM I'm able to start
>>>>>>> system. Not sure what info is need to track down this issue, so please
>>>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> can you check patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/87081/
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch helps somehow. Instead of many random oopses, now I have one and
>>>>> the same oops, here is photo:
>>>>> http://people.redhat.com/sgruszka/20100322_001.jpg
>>>>
>>>> how does e820 look like?
>>>
>>> dmesg below, I hope everything you asked for is here:
>>>
>>> Linux version 2.6.34-rc1 (stasiu@...low) (gcc version 4.4.2 20091222 (Red Hat 4.4.2-20) (GCC) ) #26 SMP Tue Mar 23 11:31:22 CET 2010
>>> BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
>>>  BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000096400 (usable)
>>>  BIOS-e820: 0000000000096400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
>>>  BIOS-e820: 00000000000e8000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
>>>  BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000cffc2840 (usable)
>>>  BIOS-e820: 00000000cffc2840 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved)
>>>  BIOS-e820: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved)
>>>  BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
>>>  BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 0000000130000000 (usable)
>> ...
>>> initial memory mapped : 0 - 01000000
>>> found SMP MP-table at [c00fe700] fe700
>>> init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-00000000373fe000
>>>  0000000000 - 0000400000 page 4k
>>>  0000400000 - 0037000000 page 2M
>>>  0037000000 - 00373fe000 page 4k
>>> kernel direct mapping tables up to 373fe000 @ 7000-d000
>>> RAMDISK: 373b8000 - 37fef224
>>> Allocated new RAMDISK: 00b2f000 - 01766224
>>> Move RAMDISK from 00000000373b8000 - 0000000037fef223 to 00b2f000 - 01766223
>>> Reserving 256MB of memory at 32MB for crashkernel (System RAM: 3327MB)
>>
>> Please check if this one helps
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Yinghai
>>
>> ---
>> [PATCH] x86: Make sure free_init_pages() free pages in boundary
>>
>> When CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM, it could use memory more efficient, or more compact.
>>
>> Example is:
>> Allocated new RAMDISK: 00ec2000 - 0248ce57
>> Move RAMDISK from 000000002ea04000 - 000000002ffcee56 to 00ec2000 - 0248ce56
>>
>> The new RAMDISK's end is not page aligned.
>> Last page could use shared with other user.
>>
>> When free_init_pages are called for initrd or .init, the page could be freed
>> could have chance to corrupt other data.
>>
>> code segment in free_init_pages()
>> |        for (; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> |                ClearPageReserved(virt_to_page(addr));
>> |                init_page_count(virt_to_page(addr));
>> |                memset((void *)(addr & ~(PAGE_SIZE-1)),
>> |                        POISON_FREE_INITMEM, PAGE_SIZE);
>> |                free_page(addr);
>> |                totalram_pages++;
>> |        }
>> last half page could be used as one whole free page.
>>
>> Try to make the boundaries to be page aligned.
> 
> Makes sense to align the addresses, but not in free_init_pages().  The
> name says 'pages' and all callers but free_initrd_mem() get it right.
> 
> Could you maybe move the fixup to that function instead?

yes, you are right, otherwise we may have chance to lose one page.

will have one updated version to address that.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/