lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:01:08 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG-REPORT][PREEMPT-RT] 2.6.33.1-rt11 triggers
 DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!p->hardirqs_enabled), in a 32-bit kvm session

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, John Kacur wrote:

> During boot-up of 2.6.33.1-rt11 in a 32-bit qemu-kvm machine,
> The following warning is reliably (every time) triggered.
> 
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at /home/jkacur/jk-2.6/kernel/fork.c:1065 copy_process+0x299/0x160f()
> Hardware name:
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 64, comm: khelper Not tainted 2.6.33.1-rt11 #1
> Call Trace:
>  [<c104961a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9a
>  [<c1049643>] warn_slowpath_null+0x12/0x15
>  [<c1046f89>] copy_process+0x299/0x160f
>  [<c1048711>] do_fork+0x235/0x4e2
>  [<c107da08>] ? register_lock_class+0x17/0x22d
>  [<c107e6dc>] ? mark_lock+0x1e/0x1c0
>  [<c1064a2f>] ? ____call_usermodehelper+0x0/0x138
>  [<c100ae09>] kernel_thread+0x79/0x81
>  [<c1064a2f>] ? ____call_usermodehelper+0x0/0x138
>  [<c100391c>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
>  [<c1064cc7>] __call_usermodehelper+0x75/0xa0
>  [<c10673b6>] worker_thread+0x1f6/0x2fb
>  [<c1067374>] ? worker_thread+0x1b4/0x2fb
>  [<c1064c52>] ? __call_usermodehelper+0x0/0xa0
>  [<c106a91e>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x46
>  [<c106a740>] kthread+0x6b/0x74
>  [<c10671c0>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x2fb
>  [<c106a6d5>] ? kthread+0x0/0x74
>  [<c106a6d5>] ? kthread+0x0/0x74
>  [<c1003922>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
> ---[ end trace a22d306b065d4a66 ]---
> 
> I am happy to provide more information to help debug this.

Can you run the following patch please ?

Thanks,

	tglx
---

diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 340cbc8..b63e8f5 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1062,7 +1062,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
 	rt_mutex_init_task(p);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!p->hardirqs_enabled);
+	//DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!p->hardirqs_enabled);
+	if (!p->hardirqs_enabled)
+		print_irqtrace_events(p);
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!p->softirqs_enabled);
 #endif
 	retval = -EAGAIN;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ