linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] arch/arm: Use set_cpus_allowed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:07:19 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, oleg@...hat.com,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arch/arm: Use set_cpus_allowed_ptr

On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 23:01 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> 
> Use set_cpus_allowed_ptr rather than set_cpus_allowed.
> 
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression E1,E2;
> @@
> 
> - set_cpus_allowed(E1, cpumask_of_cpu(E2))
> + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(E1, cpumask_of(E2))
> 
> @@
> expression E;
> identifier I;
> @@
> 
> - set_cpus_allowed(E, I)
> + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(E, &I)
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>

Thanks for doing this Julia!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/