[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269865331.24620.44.camel@concordia>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:22:11 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v9 00/31] use lmb with x86
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 19:42 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> the new lmb could be used to early_res in x86.
>
> Suggested by: David, Ben, and Thomas
>
> First three patches should go into 2.6.34
>
> -v6: change sequence as requested by Thomas
> -v7: seperate them to more patches
> -v8: add boundary checking to make sure not free partial page.
> -v9: use lmb_debug to control print out of reserve_lmb.
> add e820 clean up, and e820 become __initdata
Bike shedding perhaps, but can you maintain the naming convention, ie.
lmb_xxx() rather than xxx_lmb(). Neither is necessarily better, but all
the existing functions use the lmb_xxx() style.
cheers
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists