linux-kernel - [018/116] Bluetooth: Fix sleeping function in RFCOMM within invalid context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:54:56 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [018/116] Bluetooth: Fix sleeping function in RFCOMM within invalid context

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>

commit 485f1eff73a7b932fd3abb0dfcf804e1a1f59025 upstream.

With the commit 9e726b17422bade75fba94e625cd35fd1353e682 the
rfcomm_session_put() gets accidentially called from a timeout
callback and results in this:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:1897
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 0, name: swapper
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: P           2.6.32 #31
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81036455>] __might_sleep+0xf8/0xfa
 [<ffffffff8138ef1d>] lock_sock_nested+0x29/0xc4
 [<ffffffffa03921b3>] lock_sock+0xb/0xd [l2cap]
 [<ffffffffa03948e6>] l2cap_sock_shutdown+0x1c/0x76 [l2cap]
 [<ffffffff8106adea>] ? clockevents_program_event+0x75/0x7e
 [<ffffffff8106bea2>] ? tick_dev_program_event+0x37/0xa5
 [<ffffffffa0394967>] l2cap_sock_release+0x27/0x67 [l2cap]
 [<ffffffff8138c971>] sock_release+0x1a/0x67
 [<ffffffffa03d2492>] rfcomm_session_del+0x34/0x53 [rfcomm]
 [<ffffffffa03d24c5>] rfcomm_session_put+0x14/0x16 [rfcomm]
 [<ffffffffa03d28b4>] rfcomm_session_timeout+0xe/0x1a [rfcomm]
 [<ffffffff810554a8>] run_timer_softirq+0x1e2/0x29a
 [<ffffffffa03d28a6>] ? rfcomm_session_timeout+0x0/0x1a [rfcomm]
 [<ffffffff8104e0f6>] __do_softirq+0xfe/0x1c5
 [<ffffffff8100e8ce>] ? timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x21
 [<ffffffff8100cc4c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
 [<ffffffff8100e05b>] do_softirq+0x33/0x6b
 [<ffffffff8104daf6>] irq_exit+0x36/0x85
 [<ffffffff8100d7a9>] do_IRQ+0xa6/0xbd
 [<ffffffff8100c493>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
 <EOI>  [<ffffffff812585b3>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x269/0x294
 [<ffffffff812585a9>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x25f/0x294
 [<ffffffff81373ddc>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x97/0x107
 [<ffffffff8100aca0>] ? cpu_idle+0x53/0xaa
 [<ffffffff81429006>] ? rest_init+0x7a/0x7c
 [<ffffffff8177bc8c>] ? start_kernel+0x389/0x394
 [<ffffffff8177b29c>] ? x86_64_start_reservations+0xac/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8177b384>] ? x86_64_start_kernel+0xe4/0xeb

To fix this, the rfcomm_session_put() needs to be moved out of
rfcomm_session_timeout() into rfcomm_process_sessions(). In that
context it is perfectly fine to sleep and disconnect the socket.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Tested-by: David John <davidjon@...ontk.org>
Cc: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c
@@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ static void rfcomm_session_timeout(unsig
 	BT_DBG("session %p state %ld", s, s->state);
 
 	set_bit(RFCOMM_TIMED_OUT, &s->flags);
-	rfcomm_session_put(s);
 	rfcomm_schedule(RFCOMM_SCHED_TIMEO);
 }
 
@@ -1917,6 +1916,7 @@ static inline void rfcomm_process_sessio
 		if (test_and_clear_bit(RFCOMM_TIMED_OUT, &s->flags)) {
 			s->state = BT_DISCONN;
 			rfcomm_send_disc(s, 0);
+			rfcomm_session_put(s);
 			continue;
 		}
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/