linux-kernel - [tip:tracing/urgent] ring-buffer: Add missing unlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 3 Apr 2010 09:28:06 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, julia@...u.dk, hpa@...or.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:tracing/urgent] ring-buffer: Add missing unlock

Commit-ID:  292f60c0c4ab44aa2d589ba03c12e64a3b3c5e38
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/292f60c0c4ab44aa2d589ba03c12e64a3b3c5e38
Author:     Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
AuthorDate: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:37:02 +0200
Committer:  Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:23:24 -0400

ring-buffer: Add missing unlock

In some error handling cases the lock is not unlocked.  The return is
converted to a goto, to share the unlock at the end of the function.

A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@r exists@
expression E1;
identifier f;
@@

f (...) { <+...
* spin_lock_irq (E1,...);
... when != E1
* return ...;
...+> }
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
LKML-Reference: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1003291736440.21896@....diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c |    8 +++++---
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index d1187ef..9a0f9bf 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1209,18 +1209,19 @@ rb_remove_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, unsigned nr_pages)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
 		if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, list_empty(cpu_buffer->pages)))
-			return;
+			goto out;
 		p = cpu_buffer->pages->next;
 		bpage = list_entry(p, struct buffer_page, list);
 		list_del_init(&bpage->list);
 		free_buffer_page(bpage);
 	}
 	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, list_empty(cpu_buffer->pages)))
-		return;
+		goto out;
 
 	rb_reset_cpu(cpu_buffer);
 	rb_check_pages(cpu_buffer);
 
+out:
 	spin_unlock_irq(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
 }
 
@@ -1237,7 +1238,7 @@ rb_insert_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
 		if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, list_empty(pages)))
-			return;
+			goto out;
 		p = pages->next;
 		bpage = list_entry(p, struct buffer_page, list);
 		list_del_init(&bpage->list);
@@ -1246,6 +1247,7 @@ rb_insert_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
 	rb_reset_cpu(cpu_buffer);
 	rb_check_pages(cpu_buffer);
 
+out:
 	spin_unlock_irq(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/