linux-kernel - Re: A few questions and issues with dynticks, NOHZ and powertop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:39:24 +0200
From:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: A few questions and issues with dynticks, NOHZ and powertop

On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:17:37AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> 
> > Booting a SMP-capable kernel with "nosmp", or manually offlining one CPU
> > (or -- though I haven't tested it -- booting a SMP-capable kernel on a
> > system with merely one CPU) means that in up to about half of the calls to
> > tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() are aborted due to rcu_needs_cpu(). This is
> > quite strange to me: AFAIK, RCU is an excellent tool for SMP, but not really
> > needed for UP?
> 
> I can't answer the real question here, not knowing enough about the RCU
> implementation.  However, your impression is wrong: RCU very definitely
> _is_ useful and needed on UP systems.  It coordinates among processes
> (and interrupt handlers) as well as among processors.

Okay, but still: can't this be sped up by much on UP (especially if
CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ is set), so that we can go to sleep right away?

> > 3) USB: built-in UHCI and a built-in 0a5c:2101 Broadcom Corp. A-Link
> > BlueUsbA2 Bluetooth module; built-in EHCI and a built-in 0ac8:c302 Z-Star
> > Microelectronics Corp. Vega USB 2.0 Camera.
> > 
> > usbcore.autosuspend is enabled (= 2), of course.
> > 
> > Recent USB suspend statistics
> > Active  Device name
> > 100.0%	USB device  7-1 : BCM92045NMD (Broadcom Corp)
> > 100.0%	USB device  1-2 : Vega USB 2.0 Camera. (Vimicro Corp.)
> > 100.0%	USB device usb7 : UHCI Host Controller (Linux 2.6.34-rc3 uhci_hcd)
> > 100.0%	USB device usb1 : EHCI Host Controller (Linux 2.6.34-rc3 ehci_hcd)
> > 
> > Booting into /bin/bash on a SMP kernel booted with "nosmp" leads to ~ 10
> > wakeups per second; disabling the cursor helps halfway (~ 5 wakeups); and
> > manually unbinding the USB host drivers from the USB host devices finally
> > lead to ~ 1.1 wakeups per second. What's keeping USB from suspending these
> > unused devices here?
> 
> Either the drivers don't support autosuspend or the devices aren't
> enabled for autosuspend.  By default, autosuspend is disabled for
> (almost) all non-hub devices.  You or your distribution must enable
> it manually by doing:
> 
> 	echo auto >/sys/bus/usb/devices/.../power/level
> 
> If the driver doesn't support autosuspend then enabling it won't be
> enough; you'll also have to unbind the driver from the device.  The
> easiest way to do this is to unconfigure the device:
> 
> 	echo 0 >/sys/bus/usb/devices/.../bConfigurationValue

Thanks! This way, it works, even without manually unbinding the host
drivers.

Best,
	Dominik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/