linux-kernel - Re: A few questions and issues with dynticks, NOHZ and powertop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Apr 2010 22:41:43 +0200
From:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Adam Belay <abelay@...ell.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: A few questions and issues with dynticks, NOHZ and powertop

On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 08:42:43PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 4/4/2010 3:47, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> >Hey,
> >
> >On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 04:53:26PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >>On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 12:33:28AM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> >>>
> >>>4) SynPS/2 touchpad:
> >>>Why does moving the touchpad lead to sooo many IRQs? I can't look as fast
> >>>as the mouse pointer seems to get new data:
> >>>   62,5% (473,1)<interrupt>  : PS/2 keyboard/mouse/touchpad
> >>>
> >>
> >>80 pps @ 6 bytes/packet = 480 interrupts/sec.
> >>
> >>You can try using psmouse.rate=40 to limit it to 40 pps which should
> >>bring it to the rate of standard PS/2 mouse at the expense of
> >>sensitivity...
> >
> >as a sidenote: if we know -- like here -- that the next IRQ will be issued
> >soon, in approximately 1.75 ms (well, at least on my system), might it make
> >sense to make tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() smarter to know about this?
> 
> yes and no.
> 
> if you are very sure (95%+ or so) then absolutely it needs to know about this
> so that the C state selection code can make a better decision.
> Right now it tries to look at history to guess this delay.
> 
> Unfortunately we do not currently have such a concept in the code to make this
> work... but it'd be really nice to have.

Dmitry, are we "very sure" in this touchpad case?

Best,
	Dominik

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/