lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:12:59 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com
CC:	penberg@...helsinki.fi, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] x86: Do not write to VGA memory space if
 CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE is undefined

On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 17:11 -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/05/2010 02:04 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > 
> > Would you accept a minimized patch like this ?
> > 
> >  /* Direct interface for emergencies */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE
> >  static struct console *early_console = &early_vga_console;
> > +#else
> > +static struct console *early_console = &early_serial_console;
> > +#endif
> >  static int __initdata early_console_initialized;
> > 
> > This would prevent the problem while minimizing changes, and at the same
> > time permit early messages to be written to the serial console.
> > 
> 
> I'm unhappy about it, because *those early messages shouldn't exist in
> the first place*.  It seems to be an indication that we're invoking
> setup_early_printk() too late.  The whole playing around with max_xpos
> and max_ypos instead of using boot_params.screen_info directly is
> particularly bleacherous.
> 
> I would at least like to see if the improper invocation of
> early_printk() can be avoided.
> 
There are several such invocations.

1) arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:
ENTRY(early_idt_handler)
...
	leaq early_idt_msg(%rip),%rdi
	call early_printk

This displays "PANIC: early exception %02lx rip %lx:%lx error %lx cr2 %
lx\n" and subsequently calls dump_stack. The handler is initialized from
x86_64_start_kernel().

2) arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:x86_64_start_kernel():
	if (console_loglevel == 10)
		early_printk("Kernel alive\n");

3) init/main.c: start_kernel()
	printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s", linux_banner);
    and
	printk(KERN_NOTICE "Kernel command line: %s\n", boot_command_line);

4) arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:setup_arch()
	Several.

After that I gave up looking.

Not sure if or how those can be avoided.

Moving setup_early_printk() into x86_64_start_kernel() might be an
option, but that would require much more significant changes.

Guenter


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ