lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:55:56 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	alex.shi@...el.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Ma, Ling" <ling.ma@...el.com>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e

We cannot reproduce the issue here. Our tests here (dual quad dell) show a
performance increase in hackbench instead.

Linux 2.6.33.2 #2 SMP Mon Apr 5 11:30:56 CDT 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
./hackbench 100 process 200000
Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
Time: 3102.142
./hackbench 100 process 20000
Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
Time: 308.731
./hackbench 100 process 20000
Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
Time: 311.591
./hackbench 100 process 20000
Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
Time: 310.200
./hackbench 10 process 20000
Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
Time: 38.048
./hackbench 10 process 20000
Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
Time: 44.711
./hackbench 10 process 20000
Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
Time: 39.407
./hackbench 1 process 20000
Running with 1*40 (== 40) tasks.
Time: 9.411
./hackbench 1 process 20000
Running with 1*40 (== 40) tasks.
Time: 8.765
./hackbench 1 process 20000
Running with 1*40 (== 40) tasks.
Time: 8.822

Linux 2.6.34-rc3 #1 SMP Tue Apr 6 13:30:34 CDT 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
./hackbench 100 process 200000
Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
Time: 3003.578
./hackbench 100 process 20000
Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
Time: 300.289
./hackbench 100 process 20000
Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
Time: 301.462
./hackbench 100 process 20000
Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
Time: 301.173
./hackbench 10 process 20000
Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
Time: 41.191
./hackbench 10 process 20000
Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
Time: 41.964
./hackbench 10 process 20000
Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
Time: 41.470
./hackbench 1 process 20000
Running with 1*40 (== 40) tasks.
Time: 8.829
./hackbench 1 process 20000
Running with 1*40 (== 40) tasks.
Time: 9.166
./hackbench 1 process 20000
Running with 1*40 (== 40) tasks.
Time: 8.681


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ