linux-kernel - Re: Ugly rmap NULL ptr deref oopsie on hibernate (was Linux 2.6.34-rc3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Apr 2010 14:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	sgunderson@...foot.com
Subject: Re: Ugly rmap NULL ptr deref oopsie on hibernate (was Linux
 2.6.34-rc3)

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > So again, it's actually anon_vma.head.next that is NULL, not any of the 
> > entries on the list itself.
> > 
> > Now, I can see several cases for this:
> > 
> >  - the obvious one: anon_vma just wasn't correctly initialized, and is 
> >    missing a INIT_LIST_HEAD(&anon_vma->head). That's either a slab bug (we 
> >    don't have a whole lot of coverage of constructors), or somebody 
> >    allocated an anon_vma without using the anon_vma_cachep.
> 
> I've added code to verify this and am suspend/resuming now... Wait a
> minute, Linus, you're good! :) :
> 
> [  873.083074] PM: Preallocating image memory... 
> [  873.254359] NULL anon_vma->head.next, page 2182681

Yeah, I was pretty sure of that thing.

I still don't see _how_ it happens, though. That 'struct anon_vma' is very 
simple, and contains literally just the lock and that list_head.

Now, 'head.next' is kind of magical, because it contains that magic 
low-bit "have I been locked" thing (see "vm_lock_anon_vma()" in 
mm/mmap.c). But I'm not seeing anything else touching it.

And if you allocate a anon_vma the proper way, the SLUB constructor should 
have made sure that the head is initialized. And no normal list operation 
ever sets any list pointer to zero, although a "list_del()" on the first 
list entry could do it if that first list entry had a NULL next pointer. 

> Now, how do we track back to the place which is missing anon_vma->head
> init? Can we use the struct page *page arg to page_referenced_anon()
> somehow?

You might enable SLUB debugging (both SLUB_DEBUG _and_ SLUB_DEBUG_ON), and 
then make the "object_err()" function in mm/slub.c be non-static. You 
could call it when you see the problem, perhaps.

Or you could just add tests to both alloc_anon_vma() and free_anon_vma() 
to check that 'list_empty(&anon_vma->head)' is true. I dunno.

> >    I haven't looked at the kernel config files: do they perhaps share the 
> >    same (odd?) SLUB/SLAB/SLOB config?
> 
> what is an odd SL[AOU]B config?

Probably anything but the default SLUB these days.  But Steinar already 
said he had SLUB, so it's unlikely to be something odd.

> >  - anon_vma isn't actually an anonvma at all. 'page->mapping' was crud 
> >    with the low bit set. That sounds unlikely, but who knows. The ksm code 
> >    sets mapping to "stable_node + PAGE_MAPPING_ANON | PAGE_MAPPING_KSM"
> > 
> >    Did people have KSM enabled?
> 
> Nope, KSM is off here.

Yeah, wasn't for Steinar either. So it doesn't look like it's any odd 
corner case that depends on some odd configuration.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/