linux-kernel - Re: commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 Apr 2010 21:49:23 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff - bug?

On Wednesday 07 April 2010, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Sorry for late reply, but I was AFK during holiday.
> 
> On Fri 02-04-10 21:31:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 April 2010, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 01-04-10 14:45:35, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:39:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > Hi Rafael, Matthew,
> > > > > my laptop changed behavior during poweroff recently (after upgrading
> > > > > from .33 to .34-rc1). The system seems to be powered off (status display
> > > > > is off) at first glance but when I close the lid then I can hear a noise
> > > > > which sounds like HDD parking and when I open lid again it starts
> > > > > booting without poweroff button (same like when I suspend to RAM).
> > > > 
> > > > Hm. At a guess, we're somehow managing to leave the lid GPE enabled at 
> > > > poweroff. Can you send the output of the acpidump command?
> > > 
> > > Sure, see attached.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > Please also send the contents of /proc/acpi/wakeup.
> 
> See attached. I have checked both kernels (with and without reverted
> 9630bdd) and the output looks pretty much same. 2.6.34-rc3, however,
> looks different a bit, so I am attaching it as well.

Well, I fail to see the possible failure scenario, so let's first try a blind
shot.

Please check if this patch helps:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/86238/

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/