linux-kernel - Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2010-04-07

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	linville@...driver.com
Cc:	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2010-04-07

From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:28:32 -0400

> Here is a batch of fixes intended for 2.6.34.  Included is a variable
> initialization required for some ath9k hardware to function reliably,
> some RCU annotation to avoid some warnings in mac80211, and a fix for
> a regression relating to 802.11s mesh networking.  Also included are
> several iwlwifi fixes, include the elimination of an order-4 allocation
> during resume, avoidance of a the BUG_ON in the rate scaling routines,
> and the elimination of a DMA API warning during module removal.
> The iwlwifi patches are a little larger than I would like, but the
> fixes seem legitimate and worthwhile to me.

I guess nobody takes me seriously when I say tone down the rate
of fixes to the absolute minimum.

Oh well, what can I do, if even the most core people can't be bothered
to listen to my requests.

And people wonder why we need 8 or 9 RCs to get a release out.

Pulled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/