linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/16] [FB] viafb: Fix various resource leaks during module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:31:39 -0600
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>,
	JosephChan@....com.tw, ScottFang@...tech.com.cn,
	Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...top.org>,
	linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] [FB] viafb: Fix various resource leaks during
 module_init()

On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:22:57 +0200
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de> wrote:

> >  	if (!viafbinfo->screen_base) {
> >  		printk(KERN_INFO "ioremap failed\n");
> > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > +		rc = -EIO;
> 
> I don't know whether this is right (changing the return code) as Andrew 
> recommend a while ago:
> "It should return -ENOMEM rather than -1, but that's minor."
> So I did and now I wonder which one is correct?

To me it seems like -ENOMEM could be a bit confusing here; there's a lot of
things that could go wrong with that same error return.

That said, I did some digging around, and -ENOMEM does seem to be the
standard response to an ioremap() failure.  So I've changed it back.

> >  		if (!viafbinfo1) {
> >  			printk(KERN_ERR
> >  			"allocate the second framebuffer struct error\n");
> > -			framebuffer_release(viafbinfo);
> > -			return -ENOMEM;
> 
> rc = -ENOMEM;
> is missing?

Indeed.  Fixed.

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/