linux-kernel - Re: setitimer vs. threads: SIGALRM returned to which thread? (process master or individual child)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:09:59 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc:	Frantisek Rysanek <Frantisek.Rysanek@...t.cz>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: setitimer vs. threads: SIGALRM returned to which thread? (process
 master or individual child)



On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:

> "Frantisek Rysanek" <Frantisek.Rysanek@...t.cz> writes:
> 
> > Yes, it used to be quite a relief to have Linux do the management of 
> > timers for me. Now I have two options to choose from:
> > 1) write my own "timer queueing" (timekeeping) code to order the 
> > timers for me in the master thread
> > 2) find another function, similar to setitimer(), that would function 
> > the way setitimer() used to work in the old days...
> 
> POSIX timers (timer_create et.al.) allow specifying the signal.
> 
> So if you use custom RT signals for each threads and block them in the
> threads you don't want them it should work. This would limit the
> maximum number of threads though because there's only a limited
> range of RT signals.
> 
> There are probably other ways to do this too, e.g. with some clever
> use of timerfd_create in recent kernels.
> 
> Or you could overwrite the clone in the thread library to not 
> set signal sharing semantics. This might have other bad side effects
> though.

Nonsense. Just use the right flags when creating the posix
timer. posix timers support per thread delivery of a signal, i.e. you
can use the same signal for all threads.

   sigev.sigev_notify = SIGEV_THREAD_ID | SIGEV_SIGNAL;
   sigev.sigev_signo = YOUR_SIGNAL;
   sigev.sigev_notify_thread_id = gettid();
   timer_create(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &sigev, &timer);

That signal for that timer will not be delivered to any other thread
than the one specified in sigev.sigev_notify_thread_id as long as that
thread has not exited w/o canceling the timer.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/