[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86A0E76937111F4C92FABEC0A2098851046C7A62@az33exm21>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:36:07 -0700
From: "Nguyen Dinh-R00091" <R00091@...escale.com>
To: "Daniel Mack" <daniel@...aq.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <amit.kucheria@...onical.com>,
<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
<grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"Herring Robert-RA7055" <RA7055@...escale.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <bryan.wu@...onical.com>,
<valentin.longchamp@...l.ch>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.34-rc4 1/8] mx5: Add registration of GPIOs for MX51 Babbage board.
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Mack [mailto:daniel@...aq.de]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:46 AM
To: Nguyen Dinh-R00091
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; amit.kucheria@...onical.com;
linux@....linux.org.uk; s.hauer@...gutronix.de;
grant.likely@...retlab.ca; Herring Robert-RA7055;
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; bryan.wu@...onical.com;
valentin.longchamp@...l.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.34-rc4 1/8] mx5: Add registration of GPIOs for
MX51 Babbage board.
First, I'm glad to see Freescale sending patches for mainline code -
thanks for doing this :)
Other people might give more detailed feedback, but I'll still comment
on some things that caught my eye.
[Dinh-FSL] - Thanks Daniel!
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:10:24AM -0500, Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com
wrote:
[...]
> index d6fd396..73f2342 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/devices.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/devices.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> /*
> * Copyright 2009 Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...onical.com>
> + * Copyright (C) 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights
Reserved.
> *
> * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public
> * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License
> @@ -11,7 +12,9 @@
>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <mach/hardware.h>
> +#include <mach/gpio.h>
> #include <mach/imx-uart.h>
> +#include <mach/irqs.h>
>
> static struct resource uart0[] = {
> {
> @@ -89,8 +92,34 @@ struct platform_device mxc_fec_device = {
> .resource = mxc_fec_resources,
> };
>
> -/* Dummy definition to allow compiling in AVIC and TZIC
> simultaneously */
> +struct mxc_gpio_port mxc_gpio_ports[] = {
> + {
> + .chip.label = "gpio-0",
> + .base = MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX51_GPIO1_BASE_ADDR),
> + .irq = MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO1_LOW,
> + .virtual_irq_start = MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START
> + },
> + {
> + .chip.label = "gpio-1",
> + .base = MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX51_GPIO2_BASE_ADDR),
> + .irq = MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO2_LOW,
> + .virtual_irq_start = MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START + 32 * 1
> + },
> + {
> + .chip.label = "gpio-2",
> + .base = MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX51_GPIO3_BASE_ADDR),
> + .irq = MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO3_LOW,
> + .virtual_irq_start = MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START + 32 * 2
> + },
> + {
> + .chip.label = "gpio-3",
> + .base = MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX51_GPIO4_BASE_ADDR),
> + .irq = MX51_MXC_INT_GPIO4_LOW,
> + .virtual_irq_start = MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START + 32 * 3
> + },
> +};
> +
> int __init mxc_register_gpios(void)
> {
> - return 0;
> + return mxc_gpio_init(mxc_gpio_ports, 4);
Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of the hard-coded constant.
[Dinh-FSL]: will be corrected
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/gpio.c index
> 70b2389..1df23b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/gpio.c
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> * Copyright 2008 Juergen Beisert, kernel@...gutronix.de
> *
> * Based on code from Freescale,
> - * Copyright 2004-2006 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights
Reserved.
> + * Copyright (C) 2004-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights
Reserved.
> *
> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License @@
> -38,7 +38,6 @@ static int gpio_table_size;
> #define GPIO_ICR2 (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2C : 0x10)
> #define GPIO_IMR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x30 : 0x14)
> #define GPIO_ISR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x34 : 0x18)
> -#define GPIO_ISR (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x34 : 0x18)
>
> #define GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x3 : 0x0)
> #define GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV (cpu_is_mx1_mx2() ? 0x2 : 0x1)
> @@ -171,6 +170,25 @@ static void mxc_gpio_irq_handler(struct
mxc_gpio_port *port, u32 irq_stat)
> }
> }
>
> +/* one interrupt *per* gpio port */
> +static void mx5_gpio_irq_handler(u32 irq, struct irq_desc *desc) {
> + u32 irq_stat;
> + u32 mask = 0xFFFFFFFF;
> + struct mxc_gpio_port *port = (struct mxc_gpio_port
> +*)get_irq_data(irq);
> +
> +#ifdef MXC_GPIO_SPLIT_IRQ_2
Where is that macro defined?
[Dinh-FSL] - This macro is optional so that the interrupts can be broken
up into 2 sets.
> + if (irq == port->irq)
> + mask = 0x0000FFFF;
> + else
> + mask = 0xFFFF0000;
> +#endif
> +
> + irq_stat = __raw_readl(port->base + GPIO_ISR) &
> + (__raw_readl(port->base + GPIO_IMR) & mask);
> + mxc_gpio_irq_handler(port, irq_stat); }
> +
> /* MX1 and MX3 has one interrupt *per* gpio port */ static void
> mx3_gpio_irq_handler(u32 irq, struct irq_desc *desc) { @@ -289,11
> +307,13 @@ int __init mxc_gpio_init(struct mxc_gpio_port *port, int
cnt)
> /* its a serious configuration bug when it fails */
> BUG_ON( gpiochip_add(&port[i].chip) < 0 );
>
> - if (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx3() || cpu_is_mx25()) {
> - /* setup one handler for each entry */
> + /* setup one handler for each entry */
> + if (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx3() || cpu_is_mx25())
> set_irq_chained_handler(port[i].irq,
mx3_gpio_irq_handler);
> - set_irq_data(port[i].irq, &port[i]);
> - }
> + else if (cpu_is_mx51())
> + set_irq_chained_handler(port[i].irq,
mx5_gpio_irq_handler);
> +
> + set_irq_data(port[i].irq, &port[i]);
> }
>
> if (cpu_is_mx2()) {
> --
> 1.6.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists