lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:43:11 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] powerpc: Add rcu_read_lock() to gup_fast()
 implementation

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:05:31AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 21:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (powerpc-gup_fast-rcu.patch)
> > The powerpc page table freeing relies on the fact that IRQs hold off
> > an RCU grace period, this is currently true for all existing RCU
> > implementations but is not an assumption Paul wants to support.
> > 
> > Therefore, also take the RCU read lock along with disabling IRQs to
> > ensure the RCU grace period does at least cover these lookups.
> 
> There's a few other places that need a similar fix then. The hash page
> code for example. All the C cases should end up calling the
> find_linux_pte() helper afaik, so we should be able to stick the lock in
> there (and the hugetlbfs variant, find_linux_pte_or_hugepte()).
> 
> However, we also have cases of tight asm code walking the page tables,
> such as the tlb miss handler on embedded processors. I don't see how I
> could do that there. IE. I only have a handful of registers to play
> with, no stack, etc...
> 
> So we might have to support the interrupt assumption, at least in some
> form, with those guys...

One way to make the interrupt assumption official is to use
synchronize_sched() rather than synchronize_rcu().

							Thanx, Paul

> Cheers,
> Ben. 
> 
> > Requested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/mm/gup.c |    3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/mm/gup.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/gup.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/mm/gup.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long st
> >  	 * So long as we atomically load page table pointers versus teardown,
> >  	 * we can follow the address down to the the page and take a ref on it.
> >  	 */
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> >  	local_irq_disable();
> >  
> >  	pgdp = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
> > @@ -162,6 +163,7 @@ int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long st
> >  	} while (pgdp++, addr = next, addr != end);
> >  
> >  	local_irq_enable();
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> >  
> >  	VM_BUG_ON(nr != (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> >  	return nr;
> > @@ -171,6 +173,7 @@ int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long st
> >  
> >  slow:
> >  		local_irq_enable();
> > +		rcu_read_unlock();
> >  slow_irqon:
> >  		pr_devel("  slow path ! nr = %d\n", nr);
> >  
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ