| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:25:31 +0200 From: christian pellegrin <chripell@...e.org> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: feng.tang@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, greg@...ah.com, david-b@...bell.net, grant.likely@...retlab.ca, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] max3100: added raise_threaded_irq Hi, On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote: > > I wonder whether we should restrict this mechanism to threaded > handlers or just implement it in the following way: > ..... > This will not work out of the box when the irq is nested into some > demultiplexing thread handler (IRQF_NESTED_THREAD). > OK, I see. The solution you proposed has many other uses such testing of interrupt handlers in general. I will try to do some work along the line you suggested next week. Thank you! -- Christian Pellegrin, see http://www.evolware.org/chri/ "Real Programmers don't play tennis, or any other sport which requires you to change clothes. Mountain climbing is OK, and Real Programmers wear their climbing boots to work in case a mountain should suddenly spring up in the middle of the computer room." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists