linux-kernel - Threaded irq handler question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:35:32 +0100
From:	Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>
To:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Threaded irq handler question

Hi all,

I have a threaded irq handler attached to a level-triggered gpio
interrupt line. The check handler checks the status of the gpio line
and disables the irq line amd returns WAKE_THREAD in that case:

static irqreturn_t isr_check(int irq, void *p)
{
        if (gpio_status()) {
                disable_irq_nosync(irq);
                return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
        }

        return IRQ_NONE;
}

The thread then does some i2c transactions that will eventually
deassert the gpio line:

static irqreturn_t isr(int irq, void *p)
{
        /* do some i2c transfers */
        enable_irq(irq);
        return IRQ_HANDLED;
}

My problem is that this structure does not work, because once I call
disable_irq_nosync() on the irq in the check handler the thread will
no longer run because the irq is disabled. However if I don't call
disable_irq_nosync() I will get endless irqs because the line is
level-triggered and will not be deasserted until the thread has run.

Could someone tell me what I'm doing wrong here?

Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/