linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/9] perf: Add a perf trace option to check samples ordering reliability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:13:05 -0400
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] perf: Add a perf trace option to check samples ordering
 reliability

Hi Frederic,

Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> To ensure sample events time reordering is reliable, add a -d option
> to perf trace to check that automatically.

Just out of curiosity, is there any possibility to add 
other debugging options to perf-trace?
If so, I think we can pass some arguments for
this -d option, e.g. "-d ordering,events" and so on.
Just an idea.

Thank you,



-- 
Masami Hiramatsu
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/