| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:24:17 +0200 From: Eric Lescouet <Eric.Lescouet@...tualLogix.com> To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: USBIP (staging) driver's dependency on drivers/usb/core internal headers On 04/23/2010 08:04 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Eric Lescouet wrote: > >> Well, most of the files include hcd.h (which includes hub.h), >> only ~4 of them directly use hub.h. > > Oh. Okay, that makes life easier. Probably some of the files which > include hub.h directly also include hcd.h. > >> So what's your vote? rename hub.h into ch11.h? > > Yeah, go ahead. I like the idea of the kernel containing information > about Chapter 11. (Although I haven't heard of anyone yet going > bankrupt as a result of using Linux...) > > Alan Stern > It looks like couple of files in drivers/usb/core and usb/host have been modified already in latest snapshot (2.6.34-rc5-git5). Is it still ok to provide the patches against the mainline (2.6.34-rc5) or should I do it against the snapshot (2.6.34-rc5-git5)? Thanks, Eric. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists