linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: Allow regulator-regulator supplies to be specified by name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:50:16 +0100
From:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Allow regulator-regulator supplies to be
 specified by name

On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 15:18 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> When one regulator supplies another allow the relationship to be specified
> using names rather than struct regulators, in a similar manner to that
> allowed for consumer supplies. This allows static configuration at compile
> time, reducing the need for dynamic init code.
> 
> Also change the references to LINE supply to be system supply since line
> is sometimes used for actual supplies and therefore potentially confusing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Applied.

Thanks

Liam

-- 
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/