linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:05:43 +0200
From:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 05:59:39PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 05:45 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
>
>>> given the scheduler changes, these probably make more sense to go
>>> via one of Ingo's trees ?
>>> If everyone agrees, feel free to add my Signed-off-by:
>>
>> What about the issue Pavel reported and Willy confirmed (regression
>> on older hardware)?
>
> Having a /sys tunable makes sense, especially when running
> on battery power.  I guess that can be introduced as a patch
> 8/7 :)

... only if combined with sane default values.

Best,
	Dominik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/