lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:12:44 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INFO: umount blocked for more than 120 seconds

On 04/26/2010 03:01 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
> MiniSD card mounted through the USB card reader.
>
> .34-rc5-git6
>
> kernel: [ 5746.170226] scsi12 : usb-storage 2-2:1.0
> kernel: [ 5747.174113] scsi scan: INQUIRY result too short (5), using 36
> kernel: [ 5747.174128] scsi 12:0:0:0: Direct-Access                                    PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
> kernel: [ 5747.180721] sd 12:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
> kernel: [ 5747.190490] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdb] 2012160 512-byte logical blocks: (1.03 GB/982 MiB)
> kernel: [ 5747.193398] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
> kernel: [ 5747.193403] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 06 00 00
> kernel: [ 5747.193406] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
> kernel: [ 5747.207116] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
> kernel: [ 5747.207125]  sdb: sdb1
> kernel: [ 5747.233099] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
> kernel: [ 5747.233112] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk
> kernel: [ 5758.495211] FAT: utf8 is not a recommended IO charset for FAT filesystems, filesystem will be case sensitive!
> kernel: [ 6360.626229] INFO: task umount:4235 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> kernel: [ 6360.626237] "echo 0>  /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> kernel: [ 6360.626246] umount        D 0000059e     0  4235   3382 0x00000000
> kernel: [ 6360.626259]  f6e09e38 00000046 38aa246b 0000059e c1610cc0 c12c3880 c1610cc0 c1610cc0
> kernel: [ 6360.626282]  c1610cc0 c1610cc0 f6fa6cd0 c1610cc0 00002d16 00000000 38a9f755 0000059e
> kernel: [ 6360.626304]  f6fa6a40 f6e09e40 f6e09e70 00000000 f6e09e78 f6e09e40 c10b7cf0 f6e09e5c
> kernel: [ 6360.626334] Call Trace:
> kernel: [ 6360.626345]  [<c12c3880>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x36/0x5b
> kernel: [ 6360.626353]  [<c10b7cf0>] bdi_sched_wait+0x8/0xc
> kernel: [ 6360.626358]  [<c12c20df>] __wait_on_bit+0x34/0x5b
> kernel: [ 6360.626363]  [<c10b7ce8>] ? bdi_sched_wait+0x0/0xc
> kernel: [ 6360.626368]  [<c12c215d>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x57/0x5f
> kernel: [ 6360.626373]  [<c10b7ce8>] ? bdi_sched_wait+0x0/0xc
> kernel: [ 6360.626379]  [<c103fa75>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x4d
> kernel: [ 6360.626385]  [<c10b84d4>] wait_on_bit.clone.0+0x17/0x23
> kernel: [ 6360.626390]  [<c10b8544>] sync_inodes_sb+0x64/0x10d
> kernel: [ 6360.626397]  [<c10d373f>] ? vfs_quota_sync+0x0/0x1da
> kernel: [ 6360.626402]  [<c10baef6>] __sync_filesystem+0x37/0x62
> kernel: [ 6360.626407]  [<c10bb062>] sync_filesystem+0x3c/0x3f
> kernel: [ 6360.626413]  [<c10a2def>] generic_shutdown_super+0x1c/0xca
> kernel: [ 6360.626418]  [<c10a2eba>] kill_block_super+0x1d/0x31
> kernel: [ 6360.626423]  [<c10a3833>] deactivate_super+0x48/0x5a
> kernel: [ 6360.626429]  [<c10b385c>] mntput_no_expire+0x5e/0x89
> kernel: [ 6360.626434]  [<c10b41cf>] sys_umount+0x277/0x29b
> kernel: [ 6360.626440]  [<c10b4200>] sys_oldumount+0xd/0xf
> kernel: [ 6360.626445]  [<c1002813>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
> kernel: [ 6360.626450] 1 lock held by umount/4235:
> kernel: [ 6360.626453]  #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#34){++++..}, at: [<c10a382e>] deactivate_super+0x43/0x5a

Is this some super-slow SD card or USB reader that you just wrote a 
bunch of data to? It's not impossible it could take 2 minutes for the 
writeout of all the dirty data to complete on unmount.. did the unmount 
ever complete?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ