linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] firmware_class: fix memory leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 May 2010 07:03:36 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy@...oo.co.in>
Cc:	Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] firmware_class: fix memory leak - free allocated
	pages

On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 12:16:44AM +0530, Pavan Savoy wrote:
> 
> 
> --- On Mon, 3/5/10, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] firmware_class: fix memory leak - free allocated pages
> > To: "Tomas Winkler" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>, "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org>, "David Woodhouse" <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>, "Johannes Berg" <johannes@...solutions.net>, "Ming Lei" <tom.leiming@...il.com>, "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > Date: Monday, 3 May, 2010, 10:34 PM
> > On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 11:21:21AM
> > +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > From: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
> > > 
> > > fix memory leak introduced by the patch 6e03a201bbe:
> > > firmware: speed up request_firmware()
> > > 
> > > 1. vfree won't release pages there were allocated
> > explicitly and mapped
> > > using vmap. The memory has to be vunmap-ed and the
> > pages needs
> > > to be freed explicitly
> > > 
> > > 2. page array is moved into the 'struct
> > > firmware' so that we can free it from
> > release_firmware()
> > > and not only in fw_dev_release()
> > > 
> > > The fix doesn't break the firmware load speed.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> > > Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > > Singed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > > V2: fix authorship of the patch
> > > V3: fix const struct firmware breakage
> > 
> > Thanks, this looks much better, I've applied it now.
> 
> Sorry to bump-in the middle.
> But as a user of firmware class, what should now my fw_entry structure be?
> const struct firmware *fw_entry or,
> struct firmware *fw_entry - without the const ..

You should leave it to be whatever it was before this patch, it has not
changed anything now.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/