linux-kernel - Re: Flash IO slow 1.5 MB/s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 May 2010 12:34:52 -0500
From:	Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+linux@...il.com>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Flash IO slow 1.5 MB/s

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Trenton D. Adams
<trenton.d.adams@...il.com> wrote:
> It really looks like there's a scheduling issue.  It seems as if the
> system is IO thrashing on the flash drive, and bounces all over the
> place in terms of performance.  Sometimes it's really low, like the
> 2.73M/s, and other times it's really fast, like the 28.86M/s.
> Although you can't see it there, there were times when rsync was
> registering 200kb/s.  None of them are "really" accurate, as
> everything is queued for writing, but the final results of 1.5M/s
> (calculated from the "real" time) is terrible.

I have a similar experience (posted to this list a few months ago)
with mounting a flash device (mobile phone) in USB mass storage mode.
When I/O scheduler for that device is CFQ, write performance is really
terrible. When I change the scheduler to deadline, performance is
several times better. In 2.6.32 pdflush was replaced and CFQ
performance saw a 4x increase but still far too slow.

CFQ in <=2.6.31: 450KB/sec
CFQ in >=2.6.32: 2MB/sec
Deadline in all: 17MB/sec

I didn't try anything with dirty_bytes.

FWIW :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/