lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 08 May 2010 11:40:01 -0400
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
	DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/2] [RESEND] kprobes: Move enable/disable_kprobe()
 out	from debugfs code

Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Move enable/disable_kprobe() API out from debugfs related code,
> because these interfaces are not related to debugfs interface.

Hi Ingo,

Could you also merge this fix too?
This fixes a compiler warning when CONFIG_KPROBES && !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.

Thank you,

> 
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
> Acked-by:  Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> ---
> 
>  kernel/kprobes.c |  132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 0ed46f3..282035f 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1588,6 +1588,72 @@ static void __kprobes kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>  	arch_remove_kprobe(p);
>  }
>  
> +/* Disable one kprobe */
> +int __kprobes disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	struct kprobe *p;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
> +
> +	/* Check whether specified probe is valid. */
> +	p = __get_valid_kprobe(kp);
> +	if (unlikely(p == NULL)) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* If the probe is already disabled (or gone), just return */
> +	if (kprobe_disabled(kp))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	kp->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> +	if (p != kp)
> +		/* When kp != p, p is always enabled. */
> +		try_to_disable_aggr_kprobe(p);
> +
> +	if (!kprobes_all_disarmed && kprobe_disabled(p))
> +		disarm_kprobe(p);
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_kprobe);
> +
> +/* Enable one kprobe */
> +int __kprobes enable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	struct kprobe *p;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
> +
> +	/* Check whether specified probe is valid. */
> +	p = __get_valid_kprobe(kp);
> +	if (unlikely(p == NULL)) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (kprobe_gone(kp)) {
> +		/* This kprobe has gone, we couldn't enable it. */
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (p != kp)
> +		kp->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> +
> +	if (!kprobes_all_disarmed && kprobe_disabled(p)) {
> +		p->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> +		arm_kprobe(p);
> +	}
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_kprobe);
> +
>  void __kprobes dump_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
>  {
>  	printk(KERN_WARNING "Dumping kprobe:\n");
> @@ -1805,72 +1871,6 @@ static const struct file_operations debugfs_kprobes_operations = {
>  	.release        = seq_release,
>  };
>  
> -/* Disable one kprobe */
> -int __kprobes disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
> -{
> -	int ret = 0;
> -	struct kprobe *p;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
> -
> -	/* Check whether specified probe is valid. */
> -	p = __get_valid_kprobe(kp);
> -	if (unlikely(p == NULL)) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* If the probe is already disabled (or gone), just return */
> -	if (kprobe_disabled(kp))
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	kp->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> -	if (p != kp)
> -		/* When kp != p, p is always enabled. */
> -		try_to_disable_aggr_kprobe(p);
> -
> -	if (!kprobes_all_disarmed && kprobe_disabled(p))
> -		disarm_kprobe(p);
> -out:
> -	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_kprobe);
> -
> -/* Enable one kprobe */
> -int __kprobes enable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
> -{
> -	int ret = 0;
> -	struct kprobe *p;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
> -
> -	/* Check whether specified probe is valid. */
> -	p = __get_valid_kprobe(kp);
> -	if (unlikely(p == NULL)) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (kprobe_gone(kp)) {
> -		/* This kprobe has gone, we couldn't enable it. */
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (p != kp)
> -		kp->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> -
> -	if (!kprobes_all_disarmed && kprobe_disabled(p)) {
> -		p->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> -		arm_kprobe(p);
> -	}
> -out:
> -	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_kprobe);
> -
>  static void __kprobes arm_all_kprobes(void)
>  {
>  	struct hlist_head *head;
> 
> 

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ