linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] x86,perf: P4 PMU -- protect sensible procedures from preemption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 8 May 2010 12:09:35 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86,perf: P4 PMU -- protect sensible procedures
	from preemption

On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 10:06:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> 
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c |    8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Looks good - but it doesnt apply cleanly to tip:master:
> 
>  Hunk #3 succeeded at 828 with fuzz 2 (offset 373 lines).
>  Hunk #4 FAILED at 743.
>  1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
> 
> is there some other patch dependency?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

No, no deps, I think it's merging clash. Will update it shortly.

	-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/