lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 May 2010 12:52:52 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@...driver.com>
To:	Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: May the worker function free its struct_work (plus container)?

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:47:23AM +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> may the worker function kfree() it's own work data structure?

Actually, workqueue has no restriction on this kind of operation.
But if you must be careful with the caller in case it will refer
the freed struct.

Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ