lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 May 2010 18:49:00 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	miaox@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuset,mm: fix no node to alloc memory when
 changing cpuset's mems

On Tue, 04 May 2010 18:54:02 +0800
Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Before applying this patch, cpuset updates task->mems_allowed and mempolicy by
> setting all new bits in the nodemask first, and clearing all old unallowed bits
> later. But in the way, the allocator may find that there is no node to alloc
> memory.
> 
> The reason is that cpuset rebinds the task's mempolicy, it cleans the nodes which
> the allocater can alloc pages on, for example:
> (mpol: mempolicy)
> 	task1			task1's mpol	task2
> 	alloc page		1
> 	  alloc on node0? NO	1
> 				1		change mems from 1 to 0
> 				1		rebind task1's mpol
> 				0-1		  set new bits
> 				0	  	  clear disallowed bits
> 	  alloc on node1? NO	0
> 	  ...
> 	can't alloc page
> 	  goto oom
> 
> This patch fixes this problem by expanding the nodes range first(set newly
> allowed bits) and shrink it lazily(clear newly disallowed bits). So we use a
> variable to tell the write-side task that read-side task is reading nodemask,
> and the write-side task clears newly disallowed nodes after read-side task ends
> the current memory allocation.
> 
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/key.h>
>  #include <linux/security.h>
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/cpuset.h>
>  #include <linux/acct.h>
>  #include <linux/tsacct_kern.h>
>  #include <linux/file.h>
> @@ -1003,8 +1004,10 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
>  
>  	exit_notify(tsk, group_dead);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +	task_lock(tsk);
>  	mpol_put(tsk->mempolicy);
>  	tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
> +	task_unlock(tsk);
>  #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX
>  	if (unlikely(current->pi_state_cache))

Given that this function is already holding task_lock(tsk), this
didn't work very well.

Also, why was the inclusion of cpuset.h added?  Nothing which this
patch adds appears to need it?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ