linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] Use microsecond granularity for taskstats accounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 May 2010 14:28:48 -0700
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	"holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:	"martin.schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <martin.schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	"jlan@....com" <jlan@....com>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Use microsecond granularity for taskstats accounting

You delete the only users of cputime_to_msecs() ... should
you also delete the definition from asm-generic/cputime.h?
Same for the msecs_to_cputime() that had no users.

Is it worth adding the usecs_to_cputime() functions/macros.
Symmetry is nice (and matches what used to be there, but
unused code isn't very worthwhile.

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/