linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 16 May 2010 23:11:24 -0700
From:	Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap_ok()

On 05/16/2010 05:39 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 09:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> Btw., it would be nice to ready the LMB core bits for 
>> upstream for 2.6.35 if there's agreement about them - 
>> that will make the subsequent x86 patches much easier 
>> to merge.
> 
> Well, 2.6.34 was released already. I think it's a bit premature. We need
> to fix a few more things (the result codes for example) and do more
> testing to ensure we didn't break other archs.
> 
so looks like your change will hit 2.6.35, and my x86 changes will hit 2.6.36?

that is too long.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/