linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: Drop the skip argument from perf_arch_fetch_regs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 May 2010 12:29:30 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: Drop the skip argument from
	perf_arch_fetch_regs_caller

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:24:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 10:11 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +static inline void perf_fetch_caller_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> > -       unsigned long ip;
> > -
> >         memset(regs, 0, sizeof(*regs));
> 
> btw, do we really need that memset?
> 
> As long as we don't actually copy out to userspace, it really doesn't
> matter what is in there, and we should be setting all relevant registers
> anyway.


We probably need to decouple that yeah.

- If we don't do callchains, we don't need to deref bp
- If we don't copy to userspace, we don't need to zeroe

We should do the filling much later for tracepoints in fact,
but that doesn't concern syscalls or kprobes.

But well, I'll iterate that step by step.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/