lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 21 May 2010 10:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bug fix patch lost: git problem or just incorrect merge?



On Fri, 21 May 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > Either way, of course, we need the patch back ...
> 
> I'll fix it up.

Hmm. Pushed that out as appended, since that is the correct resolve.

HOWEVER - the code still doesn't actually make any sense. It does

	if (sk_sleep(sock->sk)) {

and that sk_sleep() today is an inline function that just does

	return &sk->sk_wq->wait;

and testing the result of an address-of operation for NULL is almost 
certainly totally non-sensical. Sure, it _might_ work (maybe 'wait' is the 
first element in the 'sk_wq' data structure, and sk_wq is NULL), but that 
kind of code is always total and utterl crap regardless.

So I pushed it out because I had done the resolve already, and it's no 
worse than it was before, but it's still a steaming buggy pile of shit.

It being iscsi, I can't bring myself to care. But somebody who does, 
should really look at it. The most likely resolution is to remove the test 
entirely, since I don't think it's ever valid to have a socket that 
doesn't have a sk_wq (there's a _lot_ of unconditional use of sk_sleep()).

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ