linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: run emergency remount on dedicated workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 May 2010 19:03:11 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...l.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: run emergency remount on dedicated workqueue

On 05/27/2010 04:59 PM, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:57:23AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Commit fa4b9074cd8428958c2adf9dc0c831f46e27c193 made s_umount depend
>> on keventd; however, emergency remount schedules works to keventd
>> which grabs s_umount creating a circular dependency.  Run emergency
>> remount on a separate workqueue to break it.
>>
> 
> I have a stupid question, why using workqueue instead of
> calling do_remount_sb() directly in emergency_remount()?
> Avoid blocking emergency_remount()?

Umm... because it's called from interrupt handler?  Right?

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/