| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:13:33 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@...ial.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] vhost: replace vhost_workqueue with per-vhost
kthread
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 06:22:21PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:24:01PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Replace vhost_workqueue with per-vhost kthread. Other than callback
> > argument change from struct work_struct * to struct vhost_poll *,
> > there's no visible change to vhost_poll_*() interface.
>
> I would prefer a substructure vhost_work, even just to make
> the code easier to review and compare to workqueue.c.
Either way this plays out, the rcu_dereference_check() calls will need
to be adjusted to reflect the change.
Thanx, Paul
> > This conversion is to make each vhost use a dedicated kthread so that
> > resource control via cgroup can be applied.
> >
> > Partially based on Sridhar Samudrala's patch.
> >
> > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala.sridhar@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Okay, here is three patch series to convert vhost to use per-vhost
> > kthread, add cgroup_attach_task_current_cg() and apply it to the vhost
> > kthreads. The conversion is mostly straight forward although flush is
> > slightly tricky.
> >
> > The problem is that I have no idea how to test this.
>
> It's a 3 step process:
>
> 1.
> Install qemu-kvm under fc13, or build recent one from source,
> get it from here:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git
>
> 2. install guest under it:
> qemu-img create -f qcow2 disk.qcow2 100G
> Now get some image (e.g. fedora 13 in fc13.iso)
> and install guest:
> qemu-kvm -enable-kvm -m 1G -cdrom fc13.iso -drive file=disk.qcow2
>
>
> 3. set up networking. I usually simply do host to guest
> on a special subnet for testing purposes:
>
> Set up a bridge named mstbr0:
>
> ifconfig mstbr0 down
> brctl delbr mstbr0
> brctl addbr mstbr0
> brctl setfd mstbr0 0
> ifconfig mstbr0 11.0.0.1
>
> cat > ifup << EOF
> #!/bin/sh -x
> /sbin/ifconfig msttap0 0.0.0.0 up
> brctl addif mstbr0 msttap0
> EOF
>
>
> qemu-kvm -enable-kvm -m 1G -cdrom fc13.iso -drive file=disk.qcow2
> -net nic,model=virtio,netdev=foo -netdev
> tap,id=foo,ifname=msttap0,script=/home/mst/ifup,downscript=no,vhost=on
>
> after you set up the guest, log into it and
> ifconfig eth0 11.0.0.2
>
> You should now be able to ping guest to host and back.
> Use something like netperf to stress the connection.
> Close qemu with kill -9 and unload module to test flushing code.
>
>
>
> > Index: work/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- work.orig/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > +++ work/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -125,10 +139,50 @@ static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_
> > vq->log_ctx = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +static int vhost_poller(void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct vhost_dev *dev = data;
> > + struct vhost_poll *poll;
> > +
> > +repeat:
> > + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); /* mb paired w/ kthread_stop */
> > +
> > + if (kthread_should_stop()) {
> > + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + poll = NULL;
> > + spin_lock(&dev->poller_lock);
> > + if (!list_empty(&dev->poll_list)) {
> > + poll = list_first_entry(&dev->poll_list,
> > + struct vhost_poll, node);
> > + list_del_init(&poll->node);
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock(&dev->poller_lock);
> > +
> > + if (poll) {
> > + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > + poll->fn(poll);
> > + smp_wmb(); /* paired with rmb in vhost_poll_flush() */
> > + poll->done_seq = poll->queue_seq;
> > + wake_up_all(&poll->done);
>
>
> This seems to add wakeups on data path, which uses spinlocks etc.
> OTOH workqueue.c adds a special barrier
> entry which only does a wakeup when needed.
> Right?
>
> > + } else
> > + schedule();
> > +
> > + goto repeat;
> > +}
> > +
> > long vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> > struct vhost_virtqueue *vqs, int nvqs)
> > {
> > + struct task_struct *poller;
> > int i;
> > +
> > + poller = kthread_create(vhost_poller, dev, "vhost-%d", current->pid);
> > + if (IS_ERR(poller))
> > + return PTR_ERR(poller);
> > +
> > dev->vqs = vqs;
> > dev->nvqs = nvqs;
> > mutex_init(&dev->mutex);
> > @@ -136,6 +190,9 @@ long vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *de
> > dev->log_file = NULL;
> > dev->memory = NULL;
> > dev->mm = NULL;
> > + spin_lock_init(&dev->poller_lock);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->poll_list);
> > + dev->poller = poller;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> > dev->vqs[i].dev = dev;
> > @@ -143,8 +200,7 @@ long vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *de
> > vhost_vq_reset(dev, dev->vqs + i);
> > if (dev->vqs[i].handle_kick)
> > vhost_poll_init(&dev->vqs[i].poll,
> > - dev->vqs[i].handle_kick,
> > - POLLIN);
> > + dev->vqs[i].handle_kick, POLLIN, dev);
> > }
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -217,6 +273,8 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev
> > if (dev->mm)
> > mmput(dev->mm);
> > dev->mm = NULL;
> > +
> > + kthread_stop(dev->poller);
> > }
> >
> > static int log_access_ok(void __user *log_base, u64 addr, unsigned long sz)
> > @@ -1113,16 +1171,3 @@ void vhost_disable_notify(struct vhost_v
> > vq_err(vq, "Failed to enable notification at %p: %d\n",
> > &vq->used->flags, r);
> > }
> > -
> > -int vhost_init(void)
> > -{
> > - vhost_workqueue = create_singlethread_workqueue("vhost");
> > - if (!vhost_workqueue)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -void vhost_cleanup(void)
> > -{
> > - destroy_workqueue(vhost_workqueue);
>
> I note that destroy_workqueue does a flush, kthread_stop
> doesn't. Right? Sure we don't need to check nothing is in one of
> the lists? Maybe add a BUG_ON?
>
> > -}
> > Index: work/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- work.orig/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > +++ work/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
> > #include <linux/vhost.h>
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > -#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > #include <linux/poll.h>
> > #include <linux/file.h>
> > #include <linux/skbuff.h>
> > @@ -20,19 +19,26 @@ enum {
> > VHOST_NET_MAX_SG = MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2,
> > };
> >
> > +struct vhost_poll;
> > +typedef void (*vhost_poll_fn_t)(struct vhost_poll *poll);
> > +
> > /* Poll a file (eventfd or socket) */
> > /* Note: there's nothing vhost specific about this structure. */
> > struct vhost_poll {
> > + vhost_poll_fn_t fn;
> > poll_table table;
> > wait_queue_head_t *wqh;
> > wait_queue_t wait;
> > - /* struct which will handle all actual work. */
> > - struct work_struct work;
> > + struct list_head node;
> > + wait_queue_head_t done;
> > unsigned long mask;
> > + struct vhost_dev *dev;
> > + int queue_seq;
> > + int done_seq;
> > };
> >
> > -void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, work_func_t func,
> > - unsigned long mask);
> > +void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_poll_fn_t fn,
> > + unsigned long mask, struct vhost_dev *dev);
> > void vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll, struct file *file);
> > void vhost_poll_stop(struct vhost_poll *poll);
> > void vhost_poll_flush(struct vhost_poll *poll);
> > @@ -63,7 +69,7 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
> > struct vhost_poll poll;
> >
> > /* The routine to call when the Guest pings us, or timeout. */
> > - work_func_t handle_kick;
> > + vhost_poll_fn_t handle_kick;
> >
> > /* Last available index we saw. */
> > u16 last_avail_idx;
> > @@ -86,11 +92,11 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
> > struct iovec hdr[VHOST_NET_MAX_SG];
> > size_t hdr_size;
> > /* We use a kind of RCU to access private pointer.
> > - * All readers access it from workqueue, which makes it possible to
> > - * flush the workqueue instead of synchronize_rcu. Therefore readers do
> > + * All readers access it from poller, which makes it possible to
> > + * flush the vhost_poll instead of synchronize_rcu. Therefore readers do
> > * not need to call rcu_read_lock/rcu_read_unlock: the beginning of
> > - * work item execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock() and the end of
> > - * work item execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock().
> > + * vhost_poll execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock() and the end of
> > + * vhost_poll execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock().
> > * Writers use virtqueue mutex. */
> > void *private_data;
> > /* Log write descriptors */
> > @@ -110,6 +116,9 @@ struct vhost_dev {
> > int nvqs;
> > struct file *log_file;
> > struct eventfd_ctx *log_ctx;
> > + spinlock_t poller_lock;
> > + struct list_head poll_list;
> > + struct task_struct *poller;
> > };
> >
> > long vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *vqs, int nvqs);
> > @@ -136,9 +145,6 @@ bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_vi
> > int vhost_log_write(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_log *log,
> > unsigned int log_num, u64 len);
> >
> > -int vhost_init(void);
> > -void vhost_cleanup(void);
> > -
> > #define vq_err(vq, fmt, ...) do { \
> > pr_debug(pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> > if ((vq)->error_ctx) \
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists