linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix a race in pid generation that causes pids to be reused immediately.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:10:15 -0400
From:	tytso@....edu
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Salman <sqazi@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	peterz@...radead.org, akpm@...x-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@...gle.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a race in pid generation that causes pids to be
 reused immediately.

On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:06:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> That seems to be purely an artifact of the cleverness of avoiding re-doing 
> the whole loop, no? If we _had_ re-done the whole loop (the "normal" 
> cmpxchg model), we would have re-started the whole pid search and handled 
> the overflow in the existing overflow handling code.

This brings up a question.  If we're going to use a cmpxchg() loop, is
there any point to doing the test-and-set game with the bitmap?  It
should be just as fast to just use cmpxchg as it is to do the
test-and-set, and isn't it more likely that various CPU architectures
will have the cmpxchg than test-and-set-bit?

We might be able to radically simplify alloc_pidmap().  Would that
cause a huge problem on some non-Intel architectures, though?

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/