linux-kernel - [tip:x86/cpu] x86, xsave: Cleanup return codes in check_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:09:45 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	error27@...il.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: [tip:x86/cpu] x86, xsave: Cleanup return codes in check_for_xstate()

Commit-ID:  d6d4d4205cf4ce4ba13bc320305afbda25303496
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/d6d4d4205cf4ce4ba13bc320305afbda25303496
Author:     Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:07:46 +0200
Committer:  H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:57:36 -0700

x86, xsave: Cleanup return codes in check_for_xstate()

The places which call check_for_xstate() only care about zero or
non-zero so this patch doesn't change how the code runs, but it's a
cleanup.  The main reason for this patch is that I'm looking for places
which don't return -EFAULT for copy_from_user() failures.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100603100746.GU5483@...ker>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c b/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
index 37e68fc..9801498 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
@@ -36,15 +36,14 @@ int check_for_xstate(struct i387_fxsave_struct __user *buf,
 
 	err = __copy_from_user(fx_sw_user, &buf->sw_reserved[0],
 			       sizeof(struct _fpx_sw_bytes));
-
 	if (err)
-		return err;
+		return -EFAULT;
 
 	/*
 	 * First Magic check failed.
 	 */
 	if (fx_sw_user->magic1 != FP_XSTATE_MAGIC1)
-		return -1;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/*
 	 * Check for error scenarios.
@@ -52,19 +51,21 @@ int check_for_xstate(struct i387_fxsave_struct __user *buf,
 	if (fx_sw_user->xstate_size < min_xstate_size ||
 	    fx_sw_user->xstate_size > xstate_size ||
 	    fx_sw_user->xstate_size > fx_sw_user->extended_size)
-		return -1;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	err = __get_user(magic2, (__u32 *) (((void *)fpstate) +
 					    fx_sw_user->extended_size -
 					    FP_XSTATE_MAGIC2_SIZE));
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 	/*
 	 * Check for the presence of second magic word at the end of memory
 	 * layout. This detects the case where the user just copied the legacy
 	 * fpstate layout with out copying the extended state information
 	 * in the memory layout.
 	 */
-	if (err || magic2 != FP_XSTATE_MAGIC2)
-		return -1;
+	if (magic2 != FP_XSTATE_MAGIC2)
+		return -EFAULT;
 
 	return 0;
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/