linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.35

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:48:12 -0400
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.35

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:43:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > The master branch of the btrfs-unstable tree is a collection of fixes
> > and cleanups, including two btrfs regressions from rc1:
> 
> Ok, no pulling then. See all the millions of threads how I wanted only
> critical fixes for -rc3 since I'll be offline.
> 
> You have a couple of hours for a minimal fix pull request with just
> the regression fixes if you want to hit -rc3. Then I'll cut a release
> and be gone for a while.

I did limit this to actual fixes, the only pure cleanups are a commit
from Andi that drops unused code (fixing warnings from gcc), one to fix
a sparse warning in ioctl.c, and fixing a gcc warning in tree_search.

The others all fix oopsen or big problems, and I think fixing warnings
helps avoid false negatives as others look for real problems?

I'm happy to rebase out the 3 non-criticals.

-chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/