linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/12] irq: implement IRQ expecting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:18:44 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, bphilips@...e.de,
	yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jeff@...zik.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	stern@...land.harvard.edu, gregkh@...e.de, khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] irq: implement IRQ expecting

Hello, Arjan.

On 06/17/2010 05:48 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:31:35 +0200
> Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>> + */
>> +void expect_irq(struct irq_expect *exp)
> 
> I would like to suggest an (optional) argument to this with a duration
> within which to expect an interrupt....
> 
> that way in the backend we can plumb this also into the idle handler
> for C state selection...

Hmmm.... oh, I see.  Wouldn't it be much better to use moving avg of
IRQ durations instead of letting the driver specify it?  Drivers are
most likely to just hard code it and It's never gonna be accurate.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/