linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] oom: give the dying task a higher priority

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:51:35 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] oom: give the dying task a higher priority

> > +	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = 1 };
> > +
> > +	if (mem)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (rt_task(p)) {
> > +		p->rt.time_slice = HZ;
> > +		return;
> 
> I have a question from long time ago. 
> If we change rt.time_slice _without_ setscheduler, is it effective?
> I mean scheduler pick up the task faster than other normal task?

if p is SCHED_OTHER, no effective. if my understand is correct, that's
only meaningfull if p is SCHED_RR.  that's the reason why I moved this
check into "if (rt_task())".

but honestly I haven't observed this works effectively. so, I agree
this can be removed as Luis mentioned.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/