linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 00/11] g_multi & other improvements and cleanpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:31:04 +0200
From:	Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@...il.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 00/11] g_multi & other improvements and cleanpus

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:52:21 +0200, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:07:55PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:55:27 +0200, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>> > Can you resend this the 5th time so I know I have all of the proper
>> > versions?
>>
>> As requested resending the whole patchset again.
>>
>>
>> Compared to the previous comments in RNDIS and CDC ACM INF files have
>> been updated (the RNDIS fix was previously sent as v4.1 but this
>> patchset includes a bit updated version) and a little fix to patch 01
>> has been applied (already sent as version v4.1).
>>
>> The g_multi "more configuration" and install mode has been exluded
>> from this patches -- they weren't ment for inclusien in the kernel in
>> th elast patchset (just to show them), so no point in including here
>> (if aynone interested refer to v4 patches 10/13 and 13/13).
>>
>>
>> I wasn't sure 100% sure what wording to use in the CDC ACM INF file so
>> I put something that is likely to be true and safe. ;) I posted
>> on m.p.d.d.d and contactec Microchip so maybe there will be some more
>> info.
>
> I've applied the first 5 patches, as I had a question about the 6th one,
> and David doesn't seem happy with the 7th.

Thanks!

> Care to resolve those issues and just resend the remaining?

The issue with 6th was just a mistake in commit message.  I resubmitted
corrected patch (marked as v5.1) which David should (I hope) find no
problems with.

As requested I'll resend patches from 6 to 11 in a second.

-- 
Best regards,                                        _     _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of  o' \,=./ `o
| Computer Science,  Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz       (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/