linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sctp: implement SIOCINQ ioctl()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:58:30 -0400
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
To:	Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò 
	<flameeyes@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: implement SIOCINQ ioctl()



Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 24/06/2010 alle 09.40 -0400, Vlad Yasevich ha scritto:
>> You don't call accept() on an SCTP SEQPACKET socket.  You can just
>> read from it.
> 
> Okay I guess I'll send a patch to the man page to fix that then.

I don't think the man page needs an update.  This is just an SCTP-ism.
There are other protocols using SOCK_SEQPACKET that implement and support
accept() call.

The SCTP api spec decided that it wouldn't support accept() and we have to
follow it.


> 
>> This way, you'll ignore listening SOCK_STREAM sockets which will not
>> have any
>> data anyway, but you'll check out listening SOCK_SEQPACKET sockets
>> that may have
>> data waiting on them. 
> 
> Ah I think I see what you mean here: SIOCINQ would work for TCP-style
> ESTABLISHED sockets _and_ SEQPACKET LISTENING sockets, right?

Right.

-vlad

> 
> Will send the updated patch in a moment.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/