linux-kernel - Re: Q: sys_futex() && timespec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:33:59 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...hat.com>
cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Danny Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Q: sys_futex() && timespec_valid()

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> 
> > We know it's not a valid absolute timeout, since there's no way
> > somebody is "waiting" for something that happened in the sixties.
> 
> Should it reject timestamps from the seventies?

No, because that's in the _VALID_ range of CLOCK_REALTIME and tv_sec
is >= 0. So we are nice to the post flower power folks.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/