linux-kernel - Re: [patch 38/52] fs: icache RCU free inodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:07:31 +1000
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 38/52] fs: icache RCU free inodes

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 06:57:11PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:02:50PM +1000, npiggin@...e.de wrote:
> > RCU free the struct inode. This will allow:
> 
> Rather than what it will allow, what are the constraints this
> imposes on allocating and freeing a struct inode?  e.g. XFS embeds
> the struct inode in a larger inode structure and does it's own
> allocation, caching and freeing of the larger structure outside of
> the VFS functionality.
> 
> Does this need to be converted to RCU? Do we need to do more
> initialisation of the struct inode than we currently do? What
> functions/call chains now implicitly require RCU freeing semantics
> on the struct inode for safe operation? What else do we need to be
> aware of?

Yeah, filesystems with their own freeing functions will need to
do a call_rcu to free it (many are not converted). Otherwise,
there is nothing else to know. They could take advantage of RCU
if they would like though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/