linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: implement and use WQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:32:01 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
	dwalker@...eaurora.org, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de,
	florian@...kler.org, andi@...stfloor.org, mst@...hat.com,
	randy.dunlap@...cle.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: implement and use WQ_UNBOUND

On 07/02/2010 11:17 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, David, Arjan.
> 
> These four patches implement unbound workqueues which can be used as
> simple execution context provider.  I changed async to use it and will
> also make fscache use it.  This can be used by setting WQ_UNBOUND on
> workqueue creation.  Works queued to unbound workqueues are implicitly
> HIGHPRI and dispatched to unbound workers as soon as resources are
> available and the only limitation applied by workqueue code is
> @max_active.  IOW, for both async and fscache, things will stay about
> the same.
> 
> WQ_UNBOUND can serve the role of WQ_SINGLE_CPU.  WQ_SINGLE_CPU is
> dropped and replaced by WQ_UNBOUND.
> 
> Arjan, I still think we'll be better off using bound workqueues for
> async but let's first convert without causing behavior difference.
> Either way isn't gonna result in any noticeable difference anyway.  If
> you're okay with the conversion, please ack it.
> 
> David, this should work for fscache/slow-work the same way too.  That
> should relieve your concern, right?  Oh, and Frederic suggested that
> we would be better off with something based on tracing API and I
> agree, so the debugfs thing is currently dropped from the tree.  What
> do you think?

Oops, forgot something.  These four patches are on top of
wq#for-next-candidate branch which is cmwq take#6 + four fix patches

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git for-next-candidate

and available in the following git tree.

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git review-cmwq

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/